I had never heard of her, so (naturally) I did some research this afternoon. I see all kinds of evidence that she did it, but seemingly speculation that she didn't. I listened to the 911 call, and frankly, to me, it seemed very contrived. I read where Dr. Vincent DiMiao claimed that the knife wound missed her artery by mere millimeters, but after seeing that idiot on the stand at the Spector trial, that leads me to believe more in her guilt than innocence. I also can't understand why the police, investigators, prosecuters, even the mayor would deem it necessary to "frame" her. What's she got on all of them that they need her out of the way? And the whole defense thing about "defend her but only if it doesn't implicate the husband"? What's that about? My husband would gladly sit on death row if it meant I wouldn't. Nope, too many things just don't add up. So far, I'm leaning towards guilty. Someone please prove me wrong - Mrs. Watson? You've done way more reasearch than me. I would love to hear your take on why you are straddling the fence.
For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 8:38-39