Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 451 to 468 of 468

Thread: Sharon Tate 2

  1. #451
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by BuzzyChick View Post
    I would love something from her estate but I'm guessing it will all be out of my price range, lol.
    I bid on items from that auction house (mostly so they will continue to send me updates on new auctions) and some stuff goes reasonable. On occasion they will have an online only auction but it's tough to win when someone locally doesn't have to pay for packaging and shipping. They have some super cool auctions if you are into celebrity estate sales.

    I was surprised, most items at the recent Jerry Lewis auction went way over estimate. Anyways, I'll watch for it to get put online and will likely bid on something.

    Quote Originally Posted by ROBERT63 View Post
    I have heard Debra is selling Sharon's wedding dress and other belongings to pay for her medical expenses for her breast cancer treatment. I know how hard it is to part with them.
    I suppose that makes sense. At some point it also makes sense to see to the disbursement of these items yourself. The Ringo Starr auction was really cool, the things he sold and how much they went for. (all went to charity) I have to believe her auction will do well.

  2. #452
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by john*thomas View Post
    I bid on items from that auction house (mostly so they will continue to send me updates on new auctions) and some stuff goes reasonable. On occasion they will have an online only auction but it's tough to win when someone locally doesn't have to pay for packaging and shipping. They have some super cool auctions if you are into celebrity estate sales.

    I was surprised, most items at the recent Jerry Lewis auction went way over estimate. Anyways, I'll watch for it to get put online and will likely bid on something.

    Where do you go to do that?



    I suppose that makes sense. At some point it also makes sense to see to the disbursement of these items yourself. The Ringo Starr auction was really cool, the things he sold and how much they went for. (all went to charity) I have to believe her auction will do well.

  3. #453
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    973
    To bid, sign up here.

    http://www.juliensauctions.com/

    Sooner or later the complete auction will be listed. You can then bid online after signing in.

  4. #454
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,029
    I don't know if anyone else has heard but a rumour has started going around saying that Roman was there that night. It popped up on a blind gossip site last week when they were talking about the film Quentin Tarantino is making. I hadn't heard of it until then but for as many saying there is no way he could have been there, others are saying they know he was and fixed things to make it look like he wasn't as there is supposedly a picture in existence proving it and it's not the one of him sitting by the front door with the words on it.

    Here's what was posted :

    This famous and horrific crime has an anniversary next year and is due to be the subject of yet another movie, this one a big budget production by an A-list director. The facts are well known except for one niggling detail that a couple of the original investigators who are still alive are hoping will one day be cleared up. The complete list of who was present did not include this significant other of one of the victims. He was supposed to be on set in Europe. However, a source who was present reports seeing him at the crime scene that night. Considering all the awful but unrelated things reported about this person over the years, this at least warrants an investigation.

    Crime: Manson murders (50th anniversary August 9, 2019)
    Movie: "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood"
    Director: Quentin Tarantino
    Significant other of one victim: Roman Polanski (Sharon Tate)
    [COLOR=inherit !important]


    [/COLOR]
    Last edited by shellc; 07-13-2018 at 08:27 PM. Reason: Added details.

  5. #455
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bulldog Town
    Posts
    36,301

  6. #456
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    973
    Me either.

  7. #457
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,029
    Quote Originally Posted by cindyt View Post
    I don't buy it.
    To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if it came out to try and get hype for the movie.

    Quentin has had a huge backlash against him the last few months with the reveal of what he did to Uma Thurman, the interview resurfacing where he said Polanski didn't rape Samantha because they were dating and it wasn't rough. The latest is his decision to keep Emile Hirsch on the film which a lot say is wrong because he assaulted a woman and many are planning to boycott it.

    The site it came from was CDaN which is known to play see-saw with the truth. I just figured I would post it to see what others thought.

  8. #458
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bulldog Town
    Posts
    36,301
    Quote Originally Posted by shellc View Post
    To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if it came out to try and get hype for the movie.

    Quentin has had a huge backlash against him the last few months with the reveal of what he did to Uma Thurman, the interview resurfacing where he said Polanski didn't rape Samantha because they were dating and it wasn't rough. The latest is his decision to keep Emile Hirsch on the film which a lot say is wrong because he assaulted a woman and many are planning to boycott it.

    The site it came from was CDaN which is known to play see-saw with the truth. I just figured I would post it to see what others thought.
    Oh, yeah, it was interesting. I think I heard something about Roman and the murders years ago, but not that he was there. Maybe he knew the motive. I don't remember.

  9. #459
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Burlington,Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,958
    I seriously doubt he was there. I am not buying that. As for a "picture" being taken that would prove otherwise , I would like to see that. Who starts this shit?
    To really know people is to be able to read between the lines on their faces.

  10. #460
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Mansfield67 View Post
    I seriously doubt he was there. I am not buying that. As for a "picture" being taken that would prove otherwise , I would like to see that. Who starts this shit?
    I wish I knew but all you are told is its sources or friends. The guy who runs the site is or was an entertainment lawyer and they get the stories from people they have met/worked with but they only ever say it's sources or friends. From the few who swear they have seen the picture in the comments, not one person could say where they saw it or how in all the years since including all the books, docs etc, no one ever found any shred of evidence he was there.

  11. #461
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Burlington,Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,958
    Quote Originally Posted by shellc View Post
    I wish I knew but all you are told is its sources or friends. The guy who runs the site is or was an entertainment lawyer and they get the stories from people they have met/worked with but they only ever say it's sources or friends. From the few who swear they have seen the picture in the comments, not one person could say where they saw it or how in all the years since including all the books, docs etc, no one ever found any shred of evidence he was there.
    Is that not always the case. When pressed for details they suddenly go blank and can't remember anything. If such a photo existed I would absolutely remember it, who showed it to me, when and where. I think this is total hype, someone is just putting a new spin on it. Let's put Polanski into the mix and see what happens.
    To really know people is to be able to read between the lines on their faces.

  12. #462
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5,695
    her wedding dress is being sold!

    Was this Debra's idea???
    <a href=http://i42.tinypic.com/etsi8j.jpg target=_blank>http://i42.tinypic.com/etsi8j.jpg</a>

  13. #463
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiffany View Post
    her wedding dress is being sold!

    Was this Debra's idea???
    I heard Debra 's friends convinced her she had to make some money to pay for those expensive treatments for her breast cancer. and selling Sharon's wedding dress and her other clothes and stuff was the only way. and Debra knows how serious breast cancer is especially since her younger sister Patti Tate died from breast cancer 18 years ago.

  14. #464
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by john*thomas View Post
    To bid, sign up here.

    http://www.juliensauctions.com/

    Sooner or later the complete auction will be listed. You can then bid online after signing in.

    Thanks

  15. #465
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Burlington,Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    2,958
    I hope Debra gets through this, I wonder if her daughter will continue her fight to keep them in prison. I hope so. Not Alisa Statman or Brie Ford.
    To really know people is to be able to read between the lines on their faces.

  16. #466
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Middle of the road
    Posts
    1,699
    Quote Originally Posted by shellc View Post
    I wish I knew but all you are told is its sources or friends. The guy who runs the site is or was an entertainment lawyer and they get the stories from people they have met/worked with but they only ever say it's sources or friends. From the few who swear they have seen the picture in the comments, not one person could say where they saw it or how in all the years since including all the books, docs etc, no one ever found any shred of evidence he was there.
    It is an entertaining site, they post "blind" items and reveal a number of them.

    I think it has gotten a little too big, too many sources of blind items, too many blinds recycled from Hollywood Babylon or Darwin Porter, etc.

    I really like Old Hollywood Gossip, and they revealed a couple of blinds over the 4th of July that I don't think had a shred of truth to them.

    James Dean faked his death in 1955 and was recently killed in a car accident (no) and that Stan Laurel strangled Thelma Todd (he didn't)

    As much as the Mason murders have been covered, it would have come up by now if Roman was in LA at the time of the murders.
    Morgan

  17. #467
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,029
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWrath of MadelineKahn View Post
    It is an entertaining site, they post "blind" items and reveal a number of them.

    I think it has gotten a little too big, too many sources of blind items, too many blinds recycled from Hollywood Babylon or Darwin Porter, etc.

    I really like Old Hollywood Gossip, and they revealed a couple of blinds over the 4th of July that I don't think had a shred of truth to them.

    James Dean faked his death in 1955 and was recently killed in a car accident (no) and that Stan Laurel strangled Thelma Todd (he didn't)

    As much as the Mason murders have been covered, it would have come up by now if Roman was in LA at the time of the murders.
    I love the old stuff too. There have been a bunch of them recently like including proof being found that Clark did run over the guy, Grace Kelly was a dead beat mum who battered her children and god knows what else but my favourite was definitely the James Dean one. It would have been one hell of a scoop if it was true but there is no way he would have been able to go all those years without being found no matter how out of the way the place was where he supposedly stayed. I think I said this before but the only Blind site I tend to believe is Blind Gossip as they have been right about many things including Kevin Spacey, Weinstein etc and they post evidence to back things up.

    As for Roman, as you say there is no way it would have been able to be kept a secret all these years. With all the books, documentaries etc covering the subject if there had been even the slightest inkling of him being present or involved, it would have come out a long time ago.
    Last edited by shellc; 07-21-2018 at 07:49 PM.

  18. #468
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,581
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWrath of MadelineKahn View Post
    It is an entertaining site, they post "blind" items and reveal a number of them.

    I think it has gotten a little too big, too many sources of blind items, too many blinds recycled from Hollywood Babylon or Darwin Porter, etc.

    I really like Old Hollywood Gossip, and they revealed a couple of blinds over the 4th of July that I don't think had a shred of truth to them.

    James Dean faked his death in 1955 and was recently killed in a car accident (no) and that Stan Laurel strangled Thelma Todd (he didn't)

    As much as the Mason murders have been covered, it would have come up by now if Roman was in LA at the time of the murders.
    I enjoy old Hollywood gossip but: Stan Laurel strangled
    Thelma Todd....wait what??!!
    (how does one even get that news to put it
    out there)
    Last edited by theotherlondon; 07-21-2018 at 02:48 PM.
    Carolyn(1958-2009) always in my heart.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •