An absolutely fascinating case, and a well-written article.
But I'm gonna warn you - and don't say I didn't warn you - this is only Part 1 of the story. It will continue in the NYT next week.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...cs-murder.html
Printable View
An absolutely fascinating case, and a well-written article.
But I'm gonna warn you - and don't say I didn't warn you - this is only Part 1 of the story. It will continue in the NYT next week.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...cs-murder.html
Wow! Thanks for sharing. I read the first stuff and will start the main body later.
Damn.
I read the first stuff and couldn't stop.
Fascinating indeed.
I feel like her brother may have something to do with it, but I may change my mind after I have read more.
Here is Part 2:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...-evidence.html
Damn.
Fascinating still, and on it goes.
I'm on third section of part I, and so far I think the brother did it too.
That is one of the most fascinating cases I've ever read.
It sounds like blood splatter analysis is a real crock, at least as it is generally practiced.
Yeah.
They should use all of the tools in the scientific arsenal against crime fighting.
Lie detectors, zodiac predispositions and phrenology come to mind.
Better yet, heal the victim with homeopathy and let them do the testifying.
This is a bit of an update on the case, although it is not promising. It includes a short video interview with Joe Bryan.
The blood spatter guy actually submitted a sworn affidavit which said in part: "My conclusions were wrong. Some of the techniques and methodology were incorrect. Therefore, some of my testimony was not correct."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/m...NK3FlFZfhRU_Y8
Thanks for that.
I can't imagine what the judge is thinking.
Joe Bryan has been denied parole for a 7th time.
https://www.propublica.org/article/joe-bryan-forensic-evidence-bloodstain-pattern-analysis?utm_content=bufferd81fa&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=b uffer&fbclid=IwAR3KmDG7uBUBEaZ8l8irRnqKbEOK74b2-CZXbzLtTYOfHNuuphNYE-WzkR4
Damn.
With a significant expert witness recanting (or at least discrediting) his testimony, the guy should be getting a new trial and should likely be freed until it's done.