Like many things, we will never know the true story.
Like many things, we will never know the true story.
Stay in Drugs. Eat your School. Don't do Vegetables.
A new book on the Zapruder film wriiten by Zapruder's granddaughter
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-r...y-six-seconds/
53 years ago today... 11/22/63 ~RIP
I was only five years old but I still remember. My older sister & brother came home early from school. I understood what had happened.
RIP.
Too many conspiracies but I believe Lee Harvey Oswald, a Marine sniper, had the skill to pull that shot off.
Theory that Governor Connally was Oswald's real target.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed...122-story.html
"In the hours after the Kennedy assassination, after Lee Harvey Oswald shot and killed Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit and was identified as the president’s assassin, a Secret Service officer named Mike Howard was dispatched to Oswald’s apartment. Howard found a little green address book, and on its 17th page under the heading “I WILL KILL” Oswald listed four men: an FBI agent named James Hosty; a right-wing general, Edwin Walker; and Vice President Richard Nixon. At the top of the list was the governor of Texas, John Connally. Through Connally’s name, Oswald had drawn a dagger, with blood drops dripping downward."
[SIGPIC]Morgan[/SIGPIC]
I read this a few minutes ago - interesting story but I haven't had time to digest it. I wonder right away if Kennedy wasn't the "real" target, wouldn't Oswald have had an easier go of things by targeting Connally at some other time? Or was he hoping to kill them both? Or was it just a good opportunity what with the timing and the route of the motorcade?
Anything is possible I guess, but I tend to think that if one goes shooting at a car containing the president, one is likely hoping or intending to shoot the president.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
happy 100th
I've always believed there was more to JFK's murder than was officially announced.
Trump to release final set of documents on JFK assassination. Nothing will become of this - Oswald still killed Kennedy
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/21/u...lassified.html
Even in the unlikely event that these final documents won't name the real killers - Stretch Armstrong and OJ, acting at the behest of Che via Marcello, acting at the behest of Armstrong - we have to recognize that Trump and Trump alone can prevent the release of these reports that I've been waiting for since I was just a young conspiracy theorist knee high to that Bigfoot from Nibiru that had a hard landing at Roswell.
Never heard of all that?
See - it was covered up entirely from the get-go.
So for this action I applaud Trump - he is restoring transparency to the White House and to American politics; of 1963.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
Oswald was involved to some extent, that I believe. Did he fire the shots ? I don't believe that he did, this went beyond him. This was orchestrated by the highest levels of government, and probably military. That's my take on it.
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
People are going to believe what they want, or what they are told to believe. JMO.
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
Vincent Bugliosi cleared up all the answered questions with his book Reclaiming History
The statement that leads me to believe in Oswald's guilt is the story about how he was initially found by police - calmly eating his lunch. If there were a presidential motorcade going down the street right in front of where you worked, you would get up and look out the window. Even if you hated the president, you would be drawn to the scene of the crowd.
They need to dig his ass up and do a proper autopsy... From the NOVA Special, the two that did the autopsy were not forensic doctors, just Naval doctors. No to mention it was rush, rush, rush....
My Posse's On Broadway
I'll go with the majority on this, always have. Bottom line is the full story and truth will never be known. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-conspiracies/
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
What's sad? That the majority believe there was a conspiracy. Why is it so hard for people to think that there was not one. No solid proof, etc. Or, do people not want to believe their government would sanction the murder of their President. Cover ups, lies and deceit by the governments of all countries has been going on for years. Nothing new there. The debate on this will go on long after we are gone.
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
I believe there was a conspiracy too.
I think it was most likely the Mafia, or maybe that there was a "Cuban connection".
I recognize that there's no evidence to support my suspicions but I hold them anyway without expecting anyone else to accept them.
I also don't think that it's impossible or even unrealistic that Oswald could have acted alone; I just don't think that he did.
Someone else here said it well earlier - we probably do know the truth; we just don't know that it is the truth.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
Back then "most everyone thought the Kennedy's could do no wrong - now we know what assholes they really were. I'm sure there were plenty of people that they were assholes to back then that the public didn't know about that wanted to shake that tree.
My Posse's On Broadway
I think a lot of people from all ends had their hand in it. That's if it was a conspiracy, which I think it was ! LOL. I've read that by killing JFK, it would knock down RFK, since he was the real trouble maker when it came to taking down organized crime. Getting rid of his brother would pacify him. That I could see, since he was arrogant SOB not unlike Trump today.
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
But he was arrogant. Trump is, I don't what you would call that one, besides the usual derogatory names. Does anyone think he is mad, insane, mentally ill ?
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
Another reason there was no conspiracy - why would they (insert killers) wait til the very last moment to kill Kennedy. Another few feet he would have been under the overpass and out of harm's way. He had motorcades the day before in San Antonio and Houston but they literally waited til the very last second ??
Last edited by cash; 10-25-2017 at 04:39 PM.
I don't know much about what kind of guy RFK was. I remember the front page of the paper the morning after her was shot - he was laying there with his eyes half open.
Trump I think is more like Manuel Noriega and Kim Jong Un kind of rolled into one; but less sane than those guys.
Who knows?
Maybe they were going to do it in Houston and something got in the way and they went to plan B.
I'm just speculating from the perspective that a conspiracy was a possibility and I suspect that there was one.
That's a good point though, that timing makes perfect sense from the lone gunman perspective.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
That's a good point though, that timing makes perfect sense from the lone gunman perspective
JFK also had motorcades in Tampa and Miami on November 18/1963. Talk about an easy target - what was the CIA/mob/FBI/Castro/Russians/Military industrial complex/LBJ /anti-Castro Cubans waiting for ????
Last edited by cash; 10-25-2017 at 05:42 PM.
Tampa Nov 18/1963 - he was an easier target here than in Dallas - a sitting duck
Last edited by cash; 10-25-2017 at 06:23 PM.
I read a very good book stating Oswald was absolutely the killer, but J. Edgar Hoover was well aware of his being in the area, from sources in Sam Giancana's family. Hoover hated the Kennedy's, and they hated him in return. RFK was getting read to replace Hoover on Jack's authority. Supposedly, Hoover ordered the Oswald investigation to stand down and did not interfere in the likely assassination attempt.
I'm no conspiracist, but the book is a compelling presentation.
Who can say?
But if I were to speculate:
Maybe because their patsy Oswald was in Dallas, along with the terminally ill, mob-connected Jack Ruby who was to eliminate the patsy before he could talk.
And maybe also because LBJ knew that he could control the immediate aftermath, autopsy and initial investigation of the assassination far more effectively in Texas by having all of the arrangements made and the right people in place to facilitate the "plan".
Yep - maybe something like that; if I were to speculate.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
So the mob hires a dyslexic misfit who couldn't drive a car. You think they would have provided Oswald with a more expensive rifle.
The LBJ theory is nonsense when you consider the number of people who would have known including many of JFK's closest friends such as McNamara/Rusk/Valenti/McCone. So LBJ kills JFK and keeps all his friends in cabinet and national security positions ?? He didn't even fire Robert Kennedy who stayed in cabinet till September 1964 ??? Would you not want to get rid of JFK's friends as soon as possible and cut off access to law enforcement and national security secrets ?? Nonsensical.
Last edited by cash; 10-25-2017 at 06:56 PM.
Who can say?
Did somebody say that the mob hired Oswald or Ruby or provided Oswald with a rifle?
Or that Oswald even had a rifle on hand that day or fired any shots?
The number of people who would have known about any LBJ connection would be the people that LBJ shared that with.
Getting rid of influential friends of JFK might make it harder to keep an eye on them and manage them - sort of like that old saying about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.
Look who raised him? A monarch-minded skirt chaser. Those kids were brought up to the tune of being better than anyone else, that women were sex things. Most politicos are arrogant. What strikes me about RFK is that while he was laying there dying--instead of whining--he asked if everyone else was okay. Grace under the hand of death.
Trump may have dementia. He may be drunk on power. Or he's maturely bankrupt.
Last edited by cindyt; 10-26-2017 at 12:00 AM.
Of course there is a delay in the release of documents - remember governments are innately incompetent and to ascribe them the ability to commit and cover up the JFK assassination is ludicrous.
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/jf...-looms-n814691
Yeah, that is true about Trump. Though I did read something before he got in and dementia was brought up. Who knows. As for RFK, I will say he was arrogant, but maybe less so then his brothers. I think he was more of a decent type of guy, with family values. I forget what book I read it in but it said he was appalled, for the most part, by his brother's numerous sexual conquests. That I could believe.
Today you could be standing next to someone who is trying their best not to fall apart. So whatever you do today, do it with kindness.
676 new documents were released yesterday.
People are saying all these documents being released will put the conspiracy theories to bed. But if you're a conspiracy theorist, and there's nothing very conspiracy-ish in them, won't you just claim these aren't the REAL files, or at least not ALL of them?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...pie/832138001/
Sincerely yours,
Upset
Not necessarily - sometimes, well maybe all of the time - you have to read between the lines or maybe read the lines in reverse; or if the conspirators were really clever; you'll have to select random letters from the documents and put them together in logical sequences by imagining what a conspirator might have been thinking and trying to hide while creating the so-called documents.
You do that diligently, page after page and word after word, cut and paste, cut and paste; and you'll have the proof.
And it won't be some vague, cryptic proof like these documents read today either - it will be something like, "THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY".
The only thing I'm really hoping to see out of all this is validation of my long held suspicions concerning the JFK - Bigfoot connection.
And the unicorns, the living unicorns; obviously.
A faulty hypothesis forming:
A German scientist using Iranian physics and French mathematics.